Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phenom (musicians)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. causa sui (talk) 20:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Phenom (musicians) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Phenom (or Phenomenal Entertainment) exists, but all I can find about them are press releases, blogs or basic listings - nothing significant in reliable sources. Doesn't meet WP:ORG or WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG SilkTork ✔Tea time 12:15, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 23:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TigerShark (talk) 00:33, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 00:37, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't meet any of the criteria at WP:BAND, and I see no other reason to keep.--Michig (talk) 07:40, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.